Filed under: Business, Challenges, On-Purpose, Personal Development, thought of the moment | Tags: change, harmony, learning, love, On-Purpose, purpose, realizing, Realizing Harmony, success
I recently got a phone call from a friend who, in the course of the conversation, asked if I’d seen the latest version of an educational seminar. I had to admit, I hadn’t seen it. But something, either in what he said, or the way he said it, made me think to myself, “Is he more interested in staying up on the latest and greatest verbiage and/or graphics as opposed to learning the information to apply it?”
That thought immediately raised the question in my own life: Am I more interested in being a student of accomplishment or being a student in order to accomplish things?
A few nights later, I remembered a parable I’d read years ago in the Wittenburg Door by Mike Yaconelli. “The Door” had awarded it their “Best Editorial Comment” for their 10th Anniversary Issue. It was titled, “The Little Boy Who Wanted to Fight Fires.” And it clearly describes the challenge.
Here it is:
THE LITTLE BOY WHO WANTED TO FIGHT FIRES
Once there was a little boy who, ever since he could remember, wanted to be a fireman. The shrill of the siren and the deep rumble of the racing fire-truck had filled his dreams
almost every night. Deep in his heart there was a longing to someday be able to help people; to save people from the ravaging grasp of a fire. It was not just a childhood fantasy. His was the unmistakable call of destiny.Growing up never changed his mind. To be sure, he had gone through all the indecision and doubts of adolescence, the well-meaning questions of friends and family who “wondered whether he could be happy as a fireman.” But he never wavered. He was to be a fireman. He was to put out fires.
Oh, how he longed for the day when he would no longer be a spectator, but could participate actively as a fire-fighter. Now, all he could do was watch.
Then the big day arrived. He was accepted at one of the best fireman schools in the country. For three years he immersed himself in his schooling. He spent hours honing his skills on practice fires. He studied fire-fighting theory long into the nights. His teachers were world-renowned.
But still after all these years he had never fought a real fire. As graduation approached, he realized that long-awaited moment was within reach.
But suddenly he began to have doubts. For the first time in his life he was unsure, afraid, and worse yet, questioning whether he ought to be a fireman at all.
It was then that one of his professors suggested he travel to Europe and study under one of the greatest fireman theorists of all time. He would be recommended by his professors and would receive the finest training available. It would last for two years.
The not-so-little boy decided to travel to Europe, and for two years he exhausted himself in dedicated study and became one of the most brilliantly educated firemen in the world. But all he had ever done was put out practice fires. Once again, graduation loomed before him. And, once again, he was haunted by indecision. He knew all about fires and could tell anyone how to fight one; in fact, he knew so much he began to feel that his superior knowledge did, in fact, place him a notch above “ordinary” firemen. He became increasingly concerned that he might have to fight fires with “uneducated” firemen, which could result in him being exposed to unnecessary danger.
It was then that he was offered a position to teach at one of the most respected fireman schools in the country.
He accepted. And for twenty-five years he taught with honors and received recognition worldwide. He died last year, and when they read his memoirs, they came across a strange passage written while on his deathbed:
“I lie here today reviewing my life. I still remember my dream, my passion to be a fireman. More than anything else I wanted to put out fires… but I realized something today. I have never put out a real fire. NEVER.”
What, in our lives – yours and mine – are we spending our time studying in order to avoid DOING? How much more life-satisfaction will we have if we launch out, and actually try to accomplish something with the knowledge we have?
Filed under: Business, Finances, God at work, thought of the moment | Tags: Capitalism, harmony, Life Style, Lifestyle, On-Purpose, Poverty, Prosperity, purpose, realizing, Realizing Harmony, Wealth, work
The “problem” of lifestyle? How can lifestyle be a “problem?”
Lifestyle is a “problem,” really, only for those who are able to live above a “survival” level of subsistence. And that would fit the vast majority of people living in North America – not just the United States. The question is: How much is “enough”? Or, at what point are we consuming and/or accumulating “too much”?
I’ve been reading “Your Work Matters to God” by Doug Sherman and William Hendricks. (1)
The authors explore the realm of work-life and its connection to spiritual life.
One of the issues they discuss is this issue they dub “The Problem of Lifestyle.”
Some may be tempted to say those are easy enough questions. Others, particularly those who like to be precise and those who have a deep desire to be “right,” will find them a lot tougher to answer.
Begin by identifying the “easy” things: What are your real NEEDS? And what are your responsibilities in terms of your family’s NEEDS? Do you have a responsibility or obligation to provide for others’ NEEDS? If so, what’s your obligation there?
How about WANTS… your desires for non-essential things? (This is where it may start to get difficult.) At what point does fulfilling your WANTS cross over into luxury, greed, or gluttony?
For those who pride themselves on ONLY spending money on NEEDS, and think you’re doing really well on that front… how can you justify reading this blog post – online, on a computer – when neither the medium (the web) nor the tool (your computer) are really necessities? If you find yourself arguing with that, then explain why those are necessities for you, while Billions in the world’s population have no access, much less “ownership” of either.
Well, “Your Work Matters to God” points out several (inadequate) “solutions” various people/groups have offered. The first three are:
1) Prosperity Theology. Claims that the Bible is “God’s Book of Success… by applying [its] truths… [one] can become the success that God designed [one] to be.”
Without quite coming out and saying it (in order to provide plausible deniability), the implication is that the Bible is “God’s Book of Fantasy” – providing whatever fame and fortune, health and love-life one desires.
But that doesn’t jibe with what the Bible actually says:
He said to them, “Beware, and be on your guard against every form of greed; for not even when one has an abundance does his life consist of his possessions.” (Luke 12:15)
2) The Franciscan Response (named after St. Francis of Assisi) Claims that God wants us to live more simply so that others might simply live. It’s a response that calls us to consider the plight of the poor.
Its claim is based on the notion that “the poverty of the poor is explained by the wealth of the wealthy.”
However, there’s an interesting quote from Michael Novak’s book, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism, that points out the fallacy of this position:
For this there is not a shred of evidence. What causes wealth is intelligent economic activity. Societies can become wealthy through the blessings of nature, which the Creator distributed unequally. Yet richly endowed nations, like the Middle Eastern oil sheikdoms, can remain in poverty for millennia without awareness of the wealth awaiting their awakening. Societies may lack resources and, nevertheless, become wealthy, like Hong Kong and Japan. Societies may be colonies or former colonies, like the United States. Others, like some in Latin America, blessed with climates that make subsistence relatively easy, can languish without significant development for generations. Theories of wealth which try to ignore cultural factors miss the central point. Theories which overlook the importance of a system of liberty miss a crucial lesson of economic history.
Certainly, there’s an important place for considering the plight of the poor. I would say it’s imperative that we consider the poor, and try to help them out of poverty. But taking a vow of poverty, while possibly providing encouragement and empathy for the poor, will do nothing to lift others’ financial status up.
Novak goes on to explain the pathetic response from the Church:
It is, therefore, a sad commentary on the sociology of knowledge in the Christian churches that so few theologians or religious leaders understand economics, industry, manufacturing, trade, and finance. Many seem trapped in pre-capitalist modes of thought. Few understand the laws of development, growth, and production. Many swiftly reduce all morality to the morality of distribution. They demand jobs without comprehending how jobs are created. They demand the distribution of the world’s goods without insight into how the store of the world’s goods may be expanded. They desire ends without critical knowledge about means. They claim to be leaders without having mastered the techniques of human progress. Their ignorance deprives them of authority. Their good intentions would be more easily honored if supported by evidence of diligent intelligence in economics.
To put that in my words: Those who hold this mindset are under the false impression that economics is a zero-sum endeavor.
3) The Capitalist Defenders. Claim that Capitalism is God’s Will for mankind, that (similar to those who promote Prosperity Theology) God wants us to be wealthy (but in contrast to the Prosperity Theologians He supposedly wants it to come) through control and command of the American economic system.
While they are correct in stating that Capitalism is far more effective in generating wealth, there’s nothing inherent in Capitalism that requires one to consider the plight of the poor. And, while Capitalism has been shaped in part by Christian principles, it is by no means the exclusive “Christian” economic system.
They need to understand that it’s possible to defend democratic capitalism as an economic system without:
1) Confusing it with Christianity
2) Trying to show that it is the only possible “Christian” economic system
3) Needing to “Christianize” it in order to function in it
4) Excusing or ignoring its sins, flaws, and failures
5) Compromising one’s allegiance to Christian theology and practice
What is needed is a plan for generating/creating wealth – even excess wealth – combined with a heart for helping the poor to also generate/create wealth. (Just giving handouts creates more dependents who think little of their own capabilities, not self-sustaining individuals with good self-image.)
(1) I feel a need to “warn” you: the book starts out rather “heavy” or “dense”, probably as a result of it being apparently a re-written doctoral thesis. And it never gets “light.” But I believe it’s worthwhile reading.
And from July…
…..
I just read an interesting blog post about the number of people in America who don’t have health insurance.
We’ve all heard the number… Every Democrat, from the President down to the various hacks that show up on the news channels, claim there are 50 million people in America without health insurance. They really mean 46.7 million, but they are rounding up… But that isn’t the issue with the number.
The issue with the number has to do with what happens when you start to break down the numbers…
* 45,700,000 without insurance
* -9,700,000 that are illegal aliens
* -17,600,000 that earn more than $50k year and could afford insurance (9.1M earn over $75k)
* -14,000,000 that are eligible for programs but just haven’t signed upThat leaves us with 6.2 million (about 2% of the population) people that can’t get coverage. [D's note: those numbers don't add up. However, the Red Cross has estimated that there were approximately that many who couldn't get insurance. So I'll let it slide.] But if we want to get picky, we can further erode this number…
* About 1/3 of the “uninsured” are the invincible. These are people under 34 that CHOOSE not to pay for coverage they don’t feel they need. [D's note: I believe these would ALL fall in under those who "just haven't signed up."]
* There are estimates that 1/3 to 1/2 of the people that are uninsured are not chronically uninsured… that means that they only lack coverage for a short time while between jobs… Only about 1/2 lack insurance for 12 months or more.Obviously there are some overlapping numbers in there… But you get the idea. Search Google for 46 million myth…
A bit later he made the following statement:
The current proposal in front of the Congress and Senate seeks to spend between $1trillion and $1.5trillion dollars. Much of the cost is “backloaded” on these proposals, meaning that keeping them up will cost hundreds of millions of dollars each year after the first ten years. And these proposals, as scored by the (non-partisan) Congressional Budget Office say that 95%-97% of the population would be covered… Odd that only 2% of legal residents are unable to get coverage now… And after spending over a trillion dollars, we won’t be doing that much better…
“We won’t be doing that much better”?!?
Going from 2% unable to get coverage up to 3-5% unable to get coverage… that sounds like we’ll be doing a whole lot worse!
Using the kind of reporting the “Mainstream” media provided when President Bush was in office and home foreclosures began to predictably increase… this health care reform proposal will increase the un-insured at least 50% if not 150%! (Here’s an example of how the home foreclosures were reported. Note at one point they mention an increase from 1.8% all the way up to 4.6%, which in alarmist terms is a 256% increase.)
Doesn’t saying “the rate of the un-insured will increase 50-150%” sound a lot more terrifying than saying it “will increase from 2% up to 3-5%”?
The fact of the matter is, under this proposal more people will be un-insured, and the cost of this new program will be astronomically higher.
And this predicted 150% increase in un-insured Americans is something that, according to the President and the majority-party leadership, “needs” to be rushed through so fast that there will (once again) be no time for anyone to read it, much less debate it.
Why are they so desperate to get it passed quickly? I think it’s because it will give them more power to control lives… and therefore, votes.
The author didn’t stop there. He went on to address those who claim that there is inadequate access to medical care…
One other thing to keep in mind is that federal law requires that hospitals treat ANYONE that comes to them with an immediate need. There isn’t a requirement for insurance… they MUST be treated. There are also free clinics and other outlets for free or inexpensive care for those that need it. That means that there IS care available for just about everyone in America, even if they don’t have insurance.
Let’s contrast that with Canada…
We can talk about long waits and lack of proper equipment. There are loads of stories about waiting a year or more for hip or knee replacement, waiting a year or more for MRIs and as long as two years to see a specialist… those stories are everywhere…
But there is a deeper problem in Canada… There aren’t enough doctors. There are 1.2 million Canadians that can’t find a doctor in their area that will accept them. Doesn’t seem like that many compared to 6.2 million Americans that can’t get health insurance, right? Well, that 1.2 million Canadians represents 5% of the population, compared with 2% of Americans that could be limited to emergency room care. Additionally, there are another 2.4 million people that say they haven’t looked… But that means that 15% of the Canadian population don’t have a doctor.
So, all isn’t honey and biscuits in the Land of Winter.
Back to the USA…
Since we are already staring at a $1.8trillion deficit for THIS year… four times bigger than the deficit last year… is it really the appropriate time to take this on? Further, there are two giant federal programs that are looking at serious problems in just a few years… Medicare and Social Security are looking at their breaking dates. For Medicare, in 2016 they will be spending money that is not in their trust accounts. Social Security will be there a couple of years later.
Maybe we should make sure that the promises already made can be kept before we make more promises…
Here’s another older draft… this one from May… mostly quoting an article from almost one year ago. Now that we’re almost 9 full months into the new Administration’s term, consider what has transpired, and how things have changed. Are our long-term economic prospects better or worse? Are we, as a country, more unified or fractured? Is our Legislature more bi-partisan or less? (I’d personally like to see it “multi-partisan” – adding in at least one significant “other” party that has enough clout to hold the other two in check.)
……
I just saw the following note and found it both convincing and sobering. It was mistakenly attributed, where I found it, to Pam Geller, the author of the blog Atlas Shrugs and journalist, but she merely said, “I wish I had written it.” The real author only identified himself/herself as a student and author with the initials “tps”.
I am a student of history. Professionally. I have written 15 books in six languages, and have studied it all my life. I think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it is just a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis, or a credit crisis. Yes these exist, but they are merely single facets on a very large gemstone that is only now coming into a sharper focus.
Something of historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it. Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has been evolving for about ten – fifteen years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two.
We demand and then codify into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people we know they can never pay back? Why?
We learn just days ago that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight by anyone, has “loaned” two trillion dollars (that is $2,000,000,000,000) over the past few months, but will not tell us to whom, or why, or disclose the terms. That is our money. Yours and mine. And that is three times the $700B we all argued about so strenuously just this past September. Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it? I thought this was a government of “we the people” who loaned our powers to our elected leaders. Apparently not.
We have spent two or more decades intentionally de-industrializing our economy. Why?
We have intentionally dumbed down our schools, ignored our history, and no longer teach our founding documents, why we are exceptional, and why we are worth preserving. Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or articulate. Parents are not revolting, teachers are not picketing, school boards continue to back mediocrity. Why?
We have now established the precedent of protesting every close election (now violently in California over a proposition that is so controversial that it wants marriage to remain between one man and one woman. Did you ever think such a thing possible just a decade ago?). We have corrupted our sacred political process by allowing unelected judges to write laws that radically change our way of life, and then mainstream Marxist groups like ACORN and others to turn our voting system into a banana republic. To what purpose?
Now our mortgage industry is collapsing, housing prices are in free fall, major industries are failing, our banking system is on the verge of collapse, social security is nearly bankrupt, as is medicare and our entire government, our education system is worse than a joke (I teach college and know precisely what I am talking about.) The list is staggering in its length, breadth, and depth. It is potentially 1929 x ten. And we are at war with an enemy we cannot name for fear of offending people of the same religion, who cannot wait to slit the throats of your children if they have the opportunity to do so.
And now we have elected a man no one knows anything about, who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen, let alone a town as big as Wasilla, Alaska. All of his associations and alliances are with real radicals in their chosen fields of employment, and everything we learn about him, drip by drip, is unsettling if not downright scary. (Surely you have heard him speak about his idea to create and fund a mandatory civilian defense force stronger than our military for use inside our borders? No? Oh of course. The media would never play that for you over and over and then demand he answer it. Sarah Palin’s pregnant daughter and $150,000 wardrobe is more important.)
Mr. Obama’s winning platform can be boiled down to one word: change.
Why?
I have never been so afraid for my country and for my children as I am now.
This man campaigned on bringing people together, something he has never, ever done in his professional life. In my assessment, Obama will divide us along philosophical lines, push us apart, and then try to realign the pieces into a new and different power structure. Change is indeed coming. And when it comes, you will never see the same nation again.
And that is only the beginning.
And I thought I would never be able to experience what the ordinary, moral German felt in the mid-1930s. In those times, the savior was a former smooth-talking rabble-rouser from the streets, about whom the average German knew next to nothing. What they did know was that he was associated with groups that shouted, shoved, and pushed around people with whom they disagreed; he edged his way onto the political stage through great oratory and promises. Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he was a great speaker. And he smiled and waved a lot. And people, even newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his “brown shirts” would bully them into submission. And then, he was duly elected to office, a full-throttled economic crisis at hand [the Great Depression]. Slowly but surely he seized the controls of government power, department by department, person by person, bureaucracy by bureaucracy. The kids joined a Youth Movement in his name, where they were taught what to think. How did he get the people on his side? He did it promising jobs to the jobless, money to the moneyless, and goodies for the military-industrial complex. He did it by indoctrinating the children, advocating gun control, health care for all, better wages, better jobs, and promising to re-instill pride once again in the country, across Europe, and across the world.
He did it with a compliant media. Did you know that? And he did this all in the name of justice and . . . change. And the people surely got what they voted for.
(Look it up if you think I am exaggerating.)
Read your history books. Many people objected in 1933 and were shouted down, called names, laughed at, and made fun of. When Winston Churchill pointed out the obvious in the late 1930s while seated in the House of Lords in England (he was not yet Prime Minister), he was booed into his seat and called a crazy troublemaker. He was right, though.
Don’t forget that Germany was the most educated, cultured country in Europe. It was full of music, art, museums, hospitals, laboratories, and universities. And in less than six years‚ a shorter time span than just two terms of the U. S. presidency‚ it was rounding up its own citizens, killing others, abrogating its laws, turning children against parents, and neighbors against neighbors. All with the best of intentions, of course. The road to Hell is paved with them.
As a practical thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions, I have a choice: I can either believe what the objective pieces of evidence tell me (even if they make me cringe with disgust); I can believe what history is shouting to me from across the chasm of seven decades; or I can hope I am wrong by closing my eyes, having another latte, and ignoring what is transpiring around me.
Some people scoff at me, others laugh, or think I am foolish, naive, or both. Perhaps I am. But I have never been afraid to look people in the eye and tell them exactly what I believe‚ and why I believe it.
I pray I am wrong. I do not think I am.
Best regards
tps
Since many of you enjoy senior citizen status, or will, sometime in the not too distant future, I thought you might be interested in this information.
Everybody is either a senior citizen, is getting close, or knows somebody that is. Most of you know by now that the Senate version (at least) of the “stimulus” bill includes provisions for extensive rationing of health care for senior citizens. The author of this part of the bill, former senator and tax evader, Tom Daschle, was credited today by Bloomberg with the following statement. Bloomberg: “Daschle says health-care reform ’will not be pain free.’ Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them.” If this does not sufficiently raise your ire, just remember that Senators and Congressmen have their own healthcare plan that is first dollar or very low co-pay which they are guaranteed the remainder of their lives and are not subject to this new law if it passes.
Please use the power of the internet to get this message out. Talk it up at the grassroots level. We have an election coming up in one year and nine months. We have the ability to address and reverse the dangerous direction the Obama administration and its allies have begun. And in the interim, we can make our voices heard!
Lets do it!